Monthly Archives: February 2015

本土經濟學研究

由樓市辣招到汽車登記稅,政府的很多政策都明顯違反了基本的經濟邏輯,原因何在?官員不濟、政客左右也許是主因,但本地經濟學者也有相當責任—相對其他地方,香港的經濟學者的確甚少研究本土議題。在歐美以至中日,幾乎每一項和錢有關的大型政策都有經濟學家研究。紐約時報不久之前就有一系列報導,探討經濟學在近年如何壓倒其他社會科學,主導了美國的政策討論。*

誠然,由本地經濟學者撰寫的評論並不罕見。早年有張五常,後有雷鼎嗚、莊太量等,近年則有經濟3.0的三位同行。這些本地經濟學者多年筆耕,為經濟學開拓本地市場功不可抹,但評論終歸是評論,和嚴謹的學術研究不可同日而言。

後者的缺乏,歸根究底其實也是政策問題。多得港大陳文敏教授被打壓的新聞,公眾對教資會如何向各大學分配經費有了多一點了解。在現行機制下,一個學系所得的經費有一大部份是和「研究成果」掛鈎,而像經濟學這種沒有直接商業價值的研究,「成果」是看有多少篇論文發表在國際頂級學術期刊。因為這些期刊多是在歐美審編,有關香港本土的研究獲青睞的機會微乎其微,老師們為保生計,自然不會花時間做本土研究。當政策只求數字上「超英趕美」,社會政策研究就被犧牲掉了。

*http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/24/upshot/how-economists-came-to-dominate-the-conversation.html

Windows 10

Windows 10終於有內建多重桌面,感覺亦較一致。Start menu其實係縮小版嘅start screen。Cortana暫時無料到。

It has always bewilders me that Windows do not have built-in multi-desktop functionality. Now Windows 10 is finally going to have one.

Overall Windows 10 feel a lot more consistent throughout then Windows 8, which feels like a forced blend between a screen-friendly interface and traditional mouse-based Windows. For example, A lot more settings are now available in the Win8-styled “PC settings”, though the good-old Control Panel is still here. My guess is the latter will be gone in the release version.

Start menu is back…sort of. Microsoft essentially scaled-down the Windows 8 start screen to get a hybrid between the old and the new.

Cortana is pretty much just a shortcut to Bing at the moment, not much to see.

經濟夫婦過情人節

我和內子都是教經濟,情人節是怎過的呢?

其實,經濟學家最在行是套利(arbitrage)。情人節當天預先紮好的花束是非常的貴,但散買的價錢是和平日一樣的。同樣,當日外出享用西式晚膳很貴,但酒樓茶記價錢不變, 在家下廚就更是加分殺著。

以今天情人節正日為例,花墟十支玫瑰連襯花,紮好要六百元,不連襯花也要三百元。散買呢?九十元—二十支。一束花三分之二的價錢去了包裝,是否值得見人見智,但若你一年只會紮一次花,那就應該在差價最大的今天紮。同樣,若你一年只會下一次廚,今天絕對錯不了。

那DIY到底有多便宜?以下為我倆今天的支出:
花盒:黃紅色馬蹄蘭$95 、紅色小玫瑰$90、沙巴葉$20,共$205。
芝士火鍋:芝士$20 、麵包$10、有機沙律菜$20等等,約共$100。

 

Powerline Network Adapters Hands-On

Most people have probably faced the problem of not being able to provide good Wi-Fi coverage for every room at home, and this problem is particularly severe in Hong Kong due to the use of concrete walls. In the past one would consider wiring the rooms with Ethernet cables or installing Wi-Fi extenders.  Today I am going to review a third option: powerline network adapters. They work by sending signal through electricity wirings, and units plugged into sockets under the same meter and will automatically form a network. To get internet access, simply connect one of the adapters to your broadband router with an Ethernet cable. Furthermore, there are Wi-Fi-broadcasting models that allow you to extend Wi-Fi coverage.

This hands-on features kits from two Chinese brands: a budget model from Tenda and a mid-range model from TP-Link. Budget models differ from higher-end ones in two major ways: First, budget models usually have maximum theoretically speed of 200Mbps, whereas higher-end ones have speeds up to 600Mbps. Since these numbers are theoretically limits, practical speed will only be a fraction of that, as my test results will show below. Second, high-end models sometimes have a pass-through socket that could be a life-saver if your room is in short of wall sockets.

Test models: Tenda P200/P201 kit (~HK$460) and TP-Link TL-WPA4230P Kit (~HK$650). Each kit comes with one cable-only unit and one Wi-Fi-broadcasting unit.

Test environment: Hong Kong Broadband 100M connection. Test conducted with speedtest.net with a Fujitsu Q584 tablet.

Basic installation: Easy. Both kits work immediately once I plug the included units into wall sockets.

Advanced Installation: you can build a network where devices roam between different Wi-Fi sources depending on their strength by setting the same SSID, encryption mode and password for all Wi-Fi access points on the network. The TP-Link unit has a button for automatically cloning my original Wi-Fi router’s settings via WPS, whereas for the Tenda unit I need to manually change settings via a browser. In practice I have never found WPS particularly easy to use, and it took several tries before the TP-Link unit was able to clone settings successfully. Furthermore, for unknown reasons I could not access the TP-Link’s settings panel the way the manual describe.

Speed: My HKBN connection has an average speed of around 60Mbps. Plugging the powerline units directly into wall sockets, I got the same speed with the TP-Link unit, whereas for the Tenda unit I only got 30Mbps at best. The results were the same regardless of whether I use an Ethernet cable or Wi-Fi, so the bottleneck is the Tenda unit itself. Speed drops dramatically if you plug the units into an extension cord—the average speed was only 3Mbps in my test.

Conclusion: Powerline network adapters present a very convenient way to extend your home network. Base on my test results, I would recommend spending the extra money to get the higher-end models due to the large speed difference.

周可夫司機今天突破個人最佳紀綠,一個早晨就來回九龍新界車全家:
7:35am 車太太上班
7:55am 車母親上班
8:31am 車父親和妹妹到地鐵站
10:00am 車婆婆去「上班」(= 打牌)
10:30am 回到中大見學生

“Chow”-ffeur has outdone himself today, having driven his whole family around the city in one morning:
7:35am Drove wife to work
7:55am Drove mother to work
8:31am Drove father and sister to subway station
10:00am Drove grandma to “work” (a.k.a. mahjong)
10:30am Back to CUHK to meet with students.

「香港做到深圳一半已經很好」

「特首梁振英昨日率團到深圳,會晤深圳市委書記王榮。梁振英表示,非常羡慕深圳發展速度,如果香港做到深圳一半的速度,已經很好。」

第一,2014年深圳的經濟增長為10%左右,而香港則有最少5%,即使說香港的增長速度本來就有深圳的一半,「已經很好」,特首不用擔心。

第二,2014年香港人均生產總值為三萬四千美元,深圳則為二萬四千。如果特首只看增長速度而不理總值,那他應該去南蘇丹而不是深圳取經—這個全球最年輕國家2014年的經濟增長速度達23.7%,比第二位的塞拉里昂足足高出10%。南蘇丹的人均生產總值?一千三百美元。

第三,即使增長速度不變,深圳的人均生產總值最少要八年才追得上香港。但增長速度是否真的不會變?深圳在2006年的增長速度達18%,2010年也還有16%,去年已下跌成10%。相比起來,香港2006年是6.5%,2010年是7.1%,去年是5%。再過幾年,相信差距只會進一步收窄。

深港合作再重要,以事實論,也實在沒必要說「香港做到深圳一半已經很好」這樣自我貶抑的說話。港人不由得問,梁振英到底是否自覺是香港人的特首?